- Open University (UK) Open Content Initiative
- Rice Connexions
- MIT OpenCourseWare
- LeMill.net
- Wikiversity.org
When I was looking at all these open education projects I was asking myself, which one I would use if I was developing a new course or program. And what was important to me is that I am familiar with the technology (publishing and course development tools) and that the project embraces a licensing scheme that I am happy with. The licensing scheme is important as it encourages or restrains the reuse of my work. I was pleasantly surprised to see that all the projects have embraced a CC license of some sort. So I felt comfortable that I could work with all sites. Being familiar with the technology pushed me toward Wikiversity. I am already familiar with using MediaWiki to publish content and find it an effective tool for developing courses online.

3 comments:
Hello Peter,
>I was pleasantly surprised to see that all the projects have embraced a CC license of some sort.
From the Wikiversities so far only the German Wikiversity (WV) uses a CC license since August 2006 - it is CC-BY-SA 2.5 Other WVs use GNU FDL. But there are efforts underway to shift Wikimedia wiki website content from GFDL to CC-BY-SA: see here e.g. Wikinews already uses also CC licence
I am already familiar with using MediaWiki to publish content and find it an effective tool for developing courses online.
well, if so, why not do it in WV ? :-)
Erkan YILMAZ
Erkan,
How right you are... WV is GFDL and not CC. I guess the point I was making is that all the projects have some form of openness given to their content. This is good...
Why not do it in WV? That is my plan. Currently I am doing work in WikiEducator. And during this course i hope to do work in WV... Thanks for the suggestion.
Ah, I just see Brent (from WikiEd) invited you to Wikiversity ? See you then around,
Erkan YILMAZ
Post a Comment